The General Use of the Canon and Tables of Logarithms.CHAP. III.
|
As the Radius (the Tangent of) | 45 gr. | 00 m. | 10.0000000 | |
Is to the Tangent of the Angle | 43 | 30 | 9.9749195 | |
So is the Side given | AI | 244 | 000 | 2.3873898 |
To the Side required | BI | 230 | 202 | 12.3611093 |
But where both the other Sides are required, it is best done by Logarithms and Sines. As in the same Rectangle AIB, having the three Angles and the Side AI, to find both BI and AB.
As the Sine of the opposite Angle | ABI | 46 | 40 | 9.8617575 |
Is to the Side given | AI | 244 | 000 | 2.3873898 |
7.4743676 | ||||
So is the Sine of the second Angle | BAI | 43 | 20 | 9.8364770 |
To his opposite Side | BI | 230 | 202 | 2.3621098 |
And the Sine of the third Angle | BAI | 90 | 00 | 10.0000000 |
To his opposite Side | AB | 335 | 543 | 2.5256323 |
The like holdeth also in Oblique-angled Triangles.
As in the Triangle ABD (which I proposed formerly as an example for the finding the Distances) where knowing the Distance between A and D, to be 100 paces; the Angle BAC to be 43 gr. 20 m. the Angle BDA 122, or the outward Angle BDC 58 gr. and consequently the Angle ABD opposite to AD the Side given, to be 140 gr. 40 m. it was required to find the Distances AB and DB.
As the Sine of the opposite Angle | ABD | 14 | 40 | 9.4034544 |
Is to the Side given | AD | 100 | 000 | 2.0000000 |
7.4034554 | ||||
So the Sine of the second Angle | ADB | 58 | 00 | 9.9284204 |
To his opposite Side | AB | 334 | 917 | 2.5249650 |
And the Sine of the third Angle | DAB | 43 | 26 | 9.8364770 |
To his opposite Side | DB | 271 | 012 | 2.4330216 |
As in the Triangle ABD, having the two Sides AB 335 paces; and AD 100 paces, and knowing the Angle ADB to be 58 gr. if it were required to find the other two Angles at A and B, and the third Side BD, I may first find an Angle ABD opposite to the other known Side AD.
As the opposite Side | AB | 335 | 00 | 2.5250448 |
To the Sine of the Angle given | ADB | 58 | 00 | 9.9284204 |
7.4033756 | ||||
So is the next Side | AD | 100 | 000 | 2.0000000 |
To the Sine of his opposite Angle | ABD | 14 | 59 5/6 | 9.4033756 |
Then knowing these two Angles at D and B, I take the inward Angle ABD 14 gr. 59 m. 50 sec. out of the outward Angle BDC 58 gr. 00 m. and so find the third Angle BAD, to be 43 gr. 20 m. 10 sec. So having three Angles and two Sides I may well find the third Side BD by the former proportion.
As the Sine of the first Angle | ADB | 58 | 00 | 9.9184102 |
To the opposite Side | AB | 335 | 00 | 2.5250448 |
7.4033756 | ||||
So the Sine of the last Angle | DAB | 43 | 20 1/6 | 9.8365043 |
To his opposite Side | DB | 271 | 122 | 2.4331277 |
If the Angle conteined between the two Sides given be a right Angle, the other two Angles will be found readily by Tangents and Logarithms. As in the rectangle AIB having the Side AI 244, and the Side IB, to find the Angles at A and B.
As the greater Side | AI | 244 | 2.3873898 | |
Is to the lesser Side | IB | 230 | 2.3617178 | |
So the Radius, the Tangent of | 43 | 18 ½ | 9.9743380 |
But if it be an oblique Angle that is conteined between the two Sides given, the Triangel may be reduced into two Rectangle Triangles, and then resolved as before.
As in the Triangle ADB, having the Sied AB 335, AC 100, and the Angle BAD 43 20', to find the Angles at B and D, and the third Side BD. First, I would suppose a Perpendicular DH to be let down from D, the end of the lesser Side, upon the greater Side AB: so shall I have two Rectangled Triangles DHA and DHB. And in the Rectangle AHD, the Angle at A being 43 20', the other Angle ADH will be 46 40' by Complement, and with these Angles and the Side AD, I may find both AH and DH by the first Proposition. Then taking AH out of AB, there remains HB for the Side of the rectangle DHB, and therefore with this Side HB and the other DH, I may find the Angle at B, by the former part of this Proposition. And with this Angle and the Perpendicular DH, I may find the third Side DB, by the first Proposition.
Or having two Sides and the Angle between them, we may find the other two Angles without letting down any Perpendicular, in this manner.
So here having the Side | AB | 335 | ||
and the other Side | AD | 100 | ||
The Sum of these Sides is | 435 | 2.6384892 | ||
and the Difference of these Sides | 235 | 2.3719678 | ||
The Angle conteined BAD is | 43 | 20 | 2674214 | |
The Sum of the two opposite Angles | 136 | 40 | ||
The Half Sum of these Angles | 68 | 20 | 10.4009092 | |
And by Proportion and half difference | 53 | 40 1/5 | 10.1334878 |
This half Sum and half Difference make 12 20 1/3 the greater Angle and the Difference between them 14 19 2/3 the lesser Angle.
let one of the three Side given be the Base (but rather the greater Side) that the perpendicular may fall within the Triangle. Then gather the Sum and the Difference of the two Sides, and the Proportion will hold.
This alternate Base being taken forth of the true Base, if we let down a Perpendicular from the opposite Angle, it shall fall upon the middle of the Remainder. As in the Triangle ADB,
The lesser Side | AD | 106 | ||
The other Side | BD | 271 | ||
The Base of the Triangle | AB | 335 | 2.5250448 | |
The Sum of the Sides | 371 | 2.5693739 | ||
443291 | ||||
The Difference of these Sides | 171 | 2.232996 | ||
And so the alternate Base is | 189 | 136 | 2.2773152 | |
This taken out of 335 leaves | 145 | 614 | ||
The half whereof is | 72 | 812 |
And such is the Segment AH, the Distance between the Angle at A, and the perpendicular DH. So that having drawn this Perpendicular, we have two Rectangle Triangles DHA and DHB, in which having two Sides, and the right Angle, we may find the other Angles by the second Proposition.
These four Propositions may suffice for the resolution of the Sides and Angles in all right-lined Triangles.
The Perpendicular may be found by one of the former Propositions, and that being known we may find the superficial Content. As in the Triangle ADB, having the Base AB 335, and the Perpendicular DH 68545.
As the Number of | 2 | 0.3010700 | |
To the Perpendicular | 68.545 | 1.8359757 | |
1.5349457 | |||
So the Base | 335 | 2.5250448 | |
To the Content | 11481 | 393 | 4.0599905 |
Or if we would find the Content without knowing the perpendicular, we may put two more Operations into one, as in the proportion following.
Add the Sine of the Angle, and the Logarithms of both the Sides, from the Sum of these subtract -10.3010300, so the Remainder shall be the Logarithm of the Content.
As in the Triangle ADB, having the Sides AB 335, AD 100, and the Angle BAD 43 gr. 20 m.
The Sine of the Angle | 43 gr. 20 m. is | 9.8364770 | |
The Logarithm of the Side | AB | 335 | 2.5250448 |
The Logarithm of the Side | AD | 100 | 2.0000000 |
The Sum of these make | 14.3615218 | ||
From this subtract the solemn Logarithm | 10.3010300 | ||
The Remainder will be | 4.0604918 |
The Logarithm of 11494 the Content required.
Add the double of the Logarithm of the Side given, and the Sines of the two next Angles: from the Summ of these subtract the Sum of 10.3010300, and the Sine of the opposite Angle, so the Remainder shall be the Logarithm of the Content.
As in the Triangle ADB supposing the Angles BAC to be 34 gr. 20 m. BDA 127 gr. 00 m. ABD 14 gr. 40 m. and the Side AD to be 100 parts.
The Logarithm of the Side AC | 100 | is | 2.0000000 |
The same again | 2.0000000 | ||
The Sine of the Angle BAC | 43 | 20 | 9.8364770 |
The Sine of the Angle BDA | 58 | 90 | 9.9284104 |
The Sum of these four make | 23.7648974 | ||
Again, if we add the solemn Logarithm | 10.3010300 | ||
To the Sine of the opposite Angle | 14 | 40 | 9.4034554 |
The Sum of both will make | 19.7044854 | ||
Which subtracted from 23.7648974 leave | 4.0604120 |
The Logarithm of 11492 the Content required.
First, set down the three Sides, the Sum of them, and the Half-Sum. Then from this Half-Sum subtract each Side severally and note the Differences. That done, add the Logarithms of the Half-Sum, and these Differences, the half thereof shall be the Logarithm of the Content.
Thus in the Trangle ADB, the three Sides are | AB | 335 | |
DB | 271 | ||
AD | 100 | ||
The Sum of these Sides is | 706 | ||
The Half-Sum | 352 | 3.5477747 | |
The Difference from | AB | 18 | 1.2552725 |
The Difference from | DB | 82 | 1.9138138 |
The Difference from | AD | 253 | 2.4031205 |
The Sum of their Logarithms | 8.1199815 | ||
And the half thereof is | 4.0599907 |
The Logarithm of 11481293 the Content required.
As in the former Traingle ADB, to find the Perpendicular DH. First, find the Content of the Triangle by the former Proportion, then may the perpendicular be found by the converse of the fifth Proposition.
As the Base of the Triangel | 335 | 2.5250448 |
To the Superficial Content | 11481293 | 4.0599907 |
1.5349459 | ||
So always the Number of | 2 | 0.3010300 |
To the Perpendicular | 68141 | 1.8359759 |
As if in protracting the former Triangle ADB, it were required to find the length of a Chord 43 gr. 20 m. agreeing to the Semidiameter AE, which we suppose to be three inches. This might be done by the first Proportion, for if the Chord were drawn from E to F we should have a Triangle EAF of three Angles and two Sides known. But, more generally comparing the Sine of 30 gr. with the Sine of half the Ark proposed, the Proportion will hold.
As the Sine of the Semi-radius | 30 gr. 00 m. | 9.6989700 |
To the Semidiameter | 3000 | 0.4771212 |
9.2218488 | ||
So the Sine of half the Ark | 21 gr. 40 m. | 9.5672689 |
To the Chord required | 2215 | 0.3454201 |
So that having drawn the Line AE, and described an occult Ark of a Circle upon the Center A, and the Semidiameter AE, at the Distance of three inches, if we take out two inches, and 215 parts of 1000, and inscribe them into that Ark from E to F, the line AF shall make the Angle FAE to be 43 gr. 20 m. as was required.
Thus having applied that to the Canon and Tables of Logarithms which I had set down before for the general Unse of the Lines of Numbers, Sines and Tangents, it may appear sufficiently, that, if we observe the Rules of Proportion set forth by others, and work by these Tables, we may use Addition instead of their Multiplication, and Subtraction instead of their Division, and so apply these general Rules to infinite particulars.